Home Jobs Employment Media Contacts Tours Video Gallery Photo Gallery Event Registration Calendar Generation Portfolio Buy power for resale
![]() |
Due to dramatic consolidation, only four major Class 1 railroads carry 90 percent of our nation’s freight, often providing unreliable service at exorbitant fees. Two bills in Congress would place the rail industry under the same antitrust laws that apply to other industries, including telecommunications, energy, trucking, and aviation. Another bill would strengthen and expand the Surface Transportation Board.
S. 2889: Bill text and co-sponsors
This legislation would be the first reauthorization of the Surface Transportation Board (STB) since its creation in 1995. The STB is the agency charged with regulating rail shipping rates. Because the current freight rail system lacks competition and effective oversight under the current STB, consumers suffer the consequences of excessive rail rates.
S. 146: Bill text and co-sponsors
H.R. 233: Bill text and co-sponsors
The bills will permit the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission to review railroad mergers under antitrust law and it will eliminate antitrust exemptions for mergers, acquisitions, collective ratemaking and coordination among railroads. The bill also will allow state Attorneys General and other private parties to sue for treble damages and to sue to halt anticompetitive conduct, both of which are not currently allowed under federal law.
The nation’s railroad system was designed to transport goods and products from rural areas and cities to distribution points across the nation. In 1980, the railroad industry found itself in poor financial health, overbuilt and failing. Seeking a remedy, Congress removed much of the regulatory oversight over the industry and merger authority was placed under the industry’s sole regulator – the Surface Transportation Board (STB). Unfortunately, in 1980, Congress did not remove the antitrust exemptions that the industry had accumulated through various acts of Congress during the 1900s.
Free from government oversight by the Department Of Justice or Federal Trade Commission, the rail industry has undergone dramatic consolidation, to levels never envisioned by Congress in 1980. And, over the years, while railroads have profited tremendously, the effect on shippers with little or no access to transportation competition along their route has been damaging and largely ignored by the STB.
|
| |
|
|
|
Railroad myths and facts
Common myths and the truth behind the impact of railroad monopoly power on captive rail (PDF version)
Opinion - Editorial
East River General Manager Jeffrey L. Nelson: Board ignores concerns of some rail customers ~ Argus Leader, Feb. 9, 2008
Background information
For background on the captive rail issue as it affects Basin Electric and the Missouri Basin Power Project see The Great Plains Robbery from the May/June 2005 issue of Basin Today.
Read "Getting Railroaded" from the February 2007 issue of Rural Electric Magazine.
Take action
Write your representatives and senators in Congress and urge them to cosponsor the Railroad Competition and Service Improvement Act and the Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act
Learn more
Attorneys general letter
Missouri Basin Power Project letter
NARUC, NASUCA and CFA letter
